![](https://procoinnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/bitcoin-3208070_1280-1200x630.jpg)
Grayscale Notices Inconsistencies In the SEC’s Actions For Approving Spot Bitcoin ETFs
• April 25, 2022 2:21 pm • CommentsGrayscale is known as one of the largest asset managers that have been persistent in trying to get a spot Bitcoin ETF approved by the SEC.
So far, it has not happened yet and the asset manager has noted down that the SEC’s actions have been somewhat inconsistent.
Right now, the only things that have been approved so far for listing are Bitcoin Future funds and the asset manager has made the statement that the basis on which the futures have been approved on can also be applied to Bitcoin spot ETFs as well.
Essentially, Grayscale is making the point that there is no reason why spot ETFs and futures for digital assets should be treated differently.
Grayscale notes SEC inconsistency in latest case for spot bitcoin ETF https://t.co/lnvg0ggyOQ April 24, 2022 at 12:05AM #CryptoCurrency
— Crypto Faucets & Crypto News Tweets (@btcfaucets_2022) April 24, 2022
TheBlockCrypto reports:
“We believe the Teucrium order confirms the fundamental point made in our November 29, 2021 letter in support of the above-referenced proposal: when it comes to approving ETPs, there is no basis for treating spot Bitcoin products differently from Bitcoin futures products,” the letter said.
The agency has yet to approve a spot ETF, citing concerns about market manipulation among exchanges that facilitate the trade of spot bitcoin.
Bitcoin futures, however, trade on US-based exchanges, which are under the regulator purview of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission.
Still, the approval of the Teucrium product is striking given it was approved under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 — as opposed to the Investment Act of 1940.
The ’34 Act is the same framework under which would Grayscale would launch its ETF.
Grayscale also makes the very clear point that a futures fund doesn’t actually have less risk for investors compared to a spot ETF fund.
The statement was made based on analysis of prices and data that has been compiled across a variety of different exchanges.
As a result, the question still remains for investors and speculators why there has not been a single spot ETF fund for any kind of digital asset approved yet when it is clear that crypto is fastest growing market sector these days.
As part of Grayscale’s attempt to continue pushing for change, the asset manager has submitted the proposal to upgrade its GTBC fund to a spot ETF and will consider all possible actions to make this happen.
@Grayscale notes @SECGov inconsistency in latest case for spot #bitcoin #ETF
Unno why there surprised 😂 #xrpcommunity #xrp #cryptonews https://t.co/T1me37IkiS— Xrp in Toronto (@XRPInToronto) April 24, 2022
Uk.Investing.com reports:
“Both spot and futures-based Bitcoin products face exposure to the same underlying Bitcoin market, any fraud or manipulation in the underlying market will affect both products in the same way. […]
The existence of these risks therefore cannot serve as justification for denying approval to one product once approval for the other product has been granted.”
Davis Polk and Wardwell also wrote that the approval of Teucrium’s product is particularly notable since it was approved under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 — as opposed to the Investment Act of 1940 — the same framework under which Grayscale hopes to launch its own ETF.
For this reason, the “SEC can’t use the distinctions between the ‘40 Act (which is what all prior futures ETFs were approved under) anymore.”
The approval for the first spot ETF fund for Bitcoin is likely to open up the gate for spot ETFs for all other prominent digital assets like XRP.
Grayscale has renewed its appeal for the SEC to approve its spot bitcoin ETF.
The new attempt targets an inconsistency in the SEC approval process, but the details have been hard to find in press announcements:
1/4— XBTO (@xbtogroup) April 25, 2022
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.