SEC Scores Further Delay, Confusion Reigns: “I Choked On My Diet Coke As I Read This”
• January 25, 2022 7:54 pm • CommentsThe SEC’s main goal is to “protect investors”.
How many times have we heard that company line rolled out in pre-packaged comments from the government agency?
Imagine driving on a road with no speed limit signs and you have to guess what the speed limit is…
Oh, and you get a ticket if you guess wrong!
Would that lack of clarity make you feel “protected”?
Of course not.
And that’s the chorus rising up from the XRP Army today as more confusion reigns supreme in the Ripple/SEC lawsuit.
At this point, the confusion being generated by the SEC is almost to be respected for the sheer level of talent it must take to perform these mental gymnastics.
Now let’s dive into the details…
Last week Ripple scored a big win when the SEC was ordered to turn over the infamous Hinman emails, and 65 other documents the SEC had been desperately trying to keep confidential.
We brought you those details here:
So…have we seen the documents yet?
Nope.
Instead of producing the documents as ordered, the SEC stalled and then filed an official Motion with the Court to reconsider the Ruling.
That happened four days ago on January 21 and James K. Filan (@FilanLaw) has been all over the story:
#XRPCommunity #SECGov v. #Ripple #XRP
BREAKING: SEC files motion requesting until February 17, 2022 to file a motion for partial reconsideration of the DPP Ruling & asks to file 20-page brief & to submit more documents for in camera review in support of motion to reconsider. pic.twitter.com/M0ms6njNB2— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) January 21, 2022
Here’s the real kicker…
Aside from showing no intent to follow the Judge’s Order that was already issued, the SEC set forth one of the most bizarre and confusing arguments we have seen yet in the case.
Here’s a direct quote of the part everyone is looking at:
So the SEC is now making two totally contradictory arguments:
One the one hand, they claim the Hinman Speech was just his personal opinion and NOT official SEC policy.
On the other hand, they’re now arguing to the Judge that the Hinman Speech and emails are so critical to the SEC’s policy making that they must be protected and kept confidential under the “Deliberative Process Privilege”.
You don’t have to be a Harvard-trained lawyer to understand those two concepts are totally opposites of each other, as @MaxiTilt perfectly sums up below:
I choked on my Diet Coke as I read this. pic.twitter.com/UybRNx0wr5
— 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝚂𝚌𝚑𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚣 (@JoelKatz) January 22, 2022
The Tweet was so good David Schwartz himself responded to say he choked on his Diet Coke when he read the SEC’s new Motion.
We all did David.
Advancing the story, just yesterday, Ripple filed its own Motion objecting to the (absurd) request.
Again, from James K. Filan:
#XRPCommunity #SECGov v. #Ripple #XRP Ripple defendants have filed an objection to the SEC's request for additional time to file a motion for reconsideration of Judge Netburn's DPP ruling. pic.twitter.com/M2vhp6JFZf
— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) January 24, 2022
That response was so well written I’m copying the full document below so you can read it:
Many people online posted about how absurd the SEC’s argument is, asking for a 6th bite at the apple:
See what I don't understand here is that why would she even considered the SEC motion and even granted to review her DPP decision? She already saw all the documents. She already ruled on the matter 5 times. What else does she needs to hear or see from the SEC? This is disgusting
— Crypto Samurai (@EliViruet) January 25, 2022
Others tried to find the silver lining or benefit of the doubt that it would somehow pay off for Ripple in the end:
I think she's giving every opportunity so there can't be an appeal. Lets be honest tho the sec is going to drag this out till their eth 2.0 bags pump and get clarity from impendeing crypto regulation. Then drop the case giving xrp no clarity and then they can sue someone else
— Azazil (@Azazil_06) January 24, 2022
And now comes the final update…
MEMO TO @JOELKATZ: I hope you’re not drinking Diet Coke when you read this because it’s about to come up your nose.
Again from James K. Filan comes the breaking report that Judge Netburn GRANTED the SEC’s Motion for delay, at least in part.
Unreal:
#XRPCommunity #SECGov v. #Ripple #XRP In a Text Only Order, Judge Netburn granted, in part, the SEC's request for extension of time regarding reconsideration of her DPP Ruling. The Order provides as follows: "The SEC's request is granted in part. The SEC may file any motion for
— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) January 24, 2022
reconsideration by February 17, 2022, and the Defendants may file their response by February 25, 2022. No reply briefs are permitted. Briefs shall be limited to ten pages (double-spaced) and the publicly-filed versions should be minimally redacted. The SEC may submit 10
— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) January 24, 2022
additional documents for in camera review, along with its motion. The deadline for either party to file an objection to District Judge Torres from the Court's January 13, 2022 Opinion & Order is stayed until 14 days from a decision on the motion for reconsideration."
— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) January 24, 2022
FinanceFeeds summed it up perfectly with this write up:
“The SEC respectfully submits that these additional documents clarify the truly deliberative nature of the discussions surrounding the Speech across the SEC, and show that the Speech was not “merely peripheral to actual policy formulation”, but was in fact an “essential link” in the SEC’s deliberative process with respect to Ether” and other digital assets. The SEC therefore seeks leave to submit for in camera review the entire set of the 66 documents…”
The whole SEC v. Ripple lawsuit has been baffling executives, law experts, investors, lawmakers, and some regulators ever since it started. This move opens a new chapter as the SEC seems to be looking to have it both ways.
A few months ago, the SEC’s attorneys argued Bill Hinman’s 2018 speech was merely his personal opinion in order to protect itself from Ripple’s attempts to make the fair notice defense stick. Judge Sarah Netburn accepted the agency’s statement as true and in her latest ruling, the court considered the drafts and emails regarding his speech as not privileged, thus ordering the SEC to deliver those to Ripple’s defense.
Now, the SEC is trying to argue that the speech was not “merely peripheral to actual policy formulation”, but was in fact an “essential link” in the SEC’s deliberative process with respect to Ether and other digital assets.
An epic 180º turn. We’re getting closer to the anniversary of the first time the court ordered the SEC to hand over those documents.
Attorney Jeremy Hogan and Stefan Huber are sounding the alarm that these delays could stretch into March…on just this one topic!
Not the resolution of the case, just resolution of this one topic:
When I read @attorneyjeremy1 then Ripple will never get these documents. The SEC could even try to go to the appellation court and object the ruling of judge torres after they objected the 2. ruling of judge Netburn in March. Makes me sick.
— Stefan Huber 🕵️♂️ (@Leerzeit) January 25, 2022
Others including YouTuber Alex Cobb have little faith the emails will contain anything worth seeing even when they are produced given they will likely be heavily redacted:
“Release the Hinman emails!”
The emails: pic.twitter.com/THeplFdUk8
— Alex Cobb (@AlexCobb_) January 15, 2022
So, was the Hinman Speech “just his personal opinion” or was it official SEC guidance?
Don’t ask the SEC…
They can’t tell you.
Or won’t tell you.
Actually, they’ll tell you it’s BOTH!
But luckily the XRP Army is very resourceful and continues to find damning evidence they never thought would be dug up.
The latest?
It’s a big one.
I’ll take your Hinman Speech and raise you a Jay Clayton speech.
Listen to these short clips and tell me if it sounds familiar…
That’s a whole lot of “we” talk if you ask me.
Spoiler alert: we = SEC
Watch here:
Jay Clayton speaking on 09/19/18 “Bill Hinman recently outlined the approach WE take to evaluate whether a digital asset is a security…” wait what? I thought it was his personal opinion. BOOM! 🎤 drop! 👀@JohnEDeaton1 @attorneyjeremy1 @s_alderoty @digitalassetbuy @BakkupBradley pic.twitter.com/cUabECstdx
— wEeZiE {X} (@NerdNationUnbox) January 25, 2022
So both Hinman and Clayton are now on record saying the “w” word.
This can’t be ignored. pic.twitter.com/6t4NCps7IA
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) January 25, 2022
Eleanor Terrett has been doing fantastic reporting on this story and she continues with her analysis:
And it's not just the "we" part. It's the fact that Clayton is encouraging people to go to the website and read the speech. Why do that if it's just one man's opinion?
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) January 25, 2022
And right after Hinman's speech there were numerous articles written with titles like "SEC announces cryptocurrency ether is not a security". Why didn't the @SECGov bother to correct them? Or when journalists asked the question in interviews on live TV? No correction. Confused.
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) January 25, 2022
Others in the XRP community continue to dig up ever MORE clips.
Watch this one:
More WE @EleanorTerrett pic.twitter.com/z8wdIZkpo4
— Digitalspacerider (@destin03817488) January 25, 2022
We’ll continue to bring you the latest on the story here at ProCoinNews!
Stay tuned and check back for more developments.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.