United States Treasury Building in Washington, D.C.

Community Bankers Take the OCC to Court Over Crypto Trust Charters

By Isaac • October 3, 2026 7:20 pm • Comments

Community bankers have stopped fighting crypto trust charters one application at a time. Now they are asking a federal judge to strike at the rule behind the entire pipeline.

The Independent Community Bankers of America sued the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in Washington on October 2, according to CryptoSlate. The complaint seeks to vacate the OCC’s national trust bank rule and Interpretive Letter 1176, arguing that the agency stretched a limited-purpose charter beyond what Congress authorized.

The stakes extend well beyond one company. ICBA says the OCC has approved or conditionally approved 21 trust banks, including 13 tied to crypto.

Trending: NEAR Intents Recovers the Full $3.8 Million After a 48-Hour Ultimatum

Banking groups previously objected to individual applications from crypto companies. The OCC kept moving.

Crypto-linked applicants connected to BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, Paxos and Ripple won decisions in late 2025. Bridge, Crypto.com parent Foris DAX, Coinbase and others followed in 2026.

The lawsuit changes the target. Instead of asking the agency to reject a particular applicant, ICBA wants the court to decide whether the OCC had authority to build the broader charter route those firms are using.

The OCC’s February rule replaced narrower language about “fiduciary activities” with the statutory phrase “the operations of a trust company and activities related thereto.” The agency says that wording preserves its authority and that national trust banks have long performed some nonfiduciary work, including custody.

ICBA reads the same change very differently. It argues that the rule lets non-depository crypto and fintech businesses perform bank-like services under a lighter framework than insured community banks face.

Each approved business plan carries a different level of legal exposure. Traditional fiduciary custody sits closer to the historical trust-bank model.

Stablecoin issuance, reserve management, payments, settlement, conversion and nonfiduciary custody sit nearer the disputed edge.

The timing is important because crypto custody rules are moving on several fronts. The SEC this week proposed a tailored custody framework for registered investment advisers and regulated funds:

European regulators are wrestling with the same basic problem from another direction: how to keep rules clear while crypto custody and transfer services continue evolving.

Those parallel debates show why the charter fight matters. Whoever controls custody and settlement infrastructure can shape how institutional crypto enters the financial system.

If the court sides with the OCC, the national trust charter becomes a firmer federal path for crypto custody and stablecoin infrastructure. Existing approvals would gain a stronger legal foundation, and pending applicants could keep building around the same framework.

If the court vacates or narrows the rule, companies with plans centered on stablecoins, payments and nonfiduciary custody could face the most disruption. Some may have to separate activities into affiliates, pursue state trust charters or rely more heavily on partner banks.

That would not necessarily end institutional Bitcoin custody. It could, however, make the federal wrapper less flexible around conversion, execution, settlement and related services.

The OCC’s own charters and licensing materials explain that national banks and federal savings associations enter the federal system through the agency’s chartering process. The OCC evaluates organizers, business plans, capital, management and risk before granting authority to operate.

That process also covers conversions, mergers and changes in control, making the charter more than a label. It is the legal doorway to a federal supervisory relationship and the activities approved under it.

The new lawsuit asks how wide that doorway can become before Congress, rather than the regulator, has to redraw it. A ruling that narrows the OCC’s authority could reach pending applications and reshape how already-approved crypto firms separate custody, payments, stablecoin and settlement functions.

Crypto firms have spent the past year winning individual approvals. Community bankers are now trying to change the board underneath all of them.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

 

Search ProCoinNews