FinCEN Drops Two Old Crypto Rules as Washington Rebuilds the Regulatory Playbook

Washington just cleared two long-running crypto proposals off the table.

FinCEN announced that it is withdrawing proposed rules aimed at transactions involving unhosted wallets and convertible virtual currency mixing. Neither proposal had become final.

The first dated to 2020. It would have required banks and money-services businesses to collect records for certain transactions above $3,000 and file reports when covered transactions exceeded $10,000.

The second dated to 2023. It sought to treat international crypto mixing as a class of transactions of primary money-laundering concern and would have imposed a new reporting framework on covered financial institutions.

FinCEN said it considered the public comments filed on both proposals. The agency tied the withdrawals to President Trump’s deregulatory agenda and an effort to make digital-asset rules fit their actual purpose.

The move ends two proposals that had become symbols of the fight over financial privacy. An unhosted wallet lets its owner control the keys without relying on an exchange or bank.

Mixing tools can obscure the path of funds on a public blockchain. That creates obvious enforcement concerns, but it can also serve lawful privacy needs.

The Federal Register notice fills in the practical details. FinCEN says it will take no further action on the unhosted-wallet proposal, ending a rulemaking left unresolved for nearly six years.

The abandoned proposal would have covered transactions between regulated institutions and unhosted or certain foreign-hosted wallets. Its thresholds were $3,000 for recordkeeping and more than $10,000 for reporting, including multiple transactions aggregated over 24 hours.

That framework never took effect. Its withdrawal means banks and crypto businesses do not have to build a new compliance layer around those proposed triggers, although their existing Bank Secrecy Act duties continue.

The notice also makes the status unambiguous for legal and compliance teams. This is a withdrawal, not another extension of the comment period or a delayed effective date.

CryptoSlate reports that the mixing proposal reached beyond services marketed as mixers. Its broad definition could have captured techniques that pool funds, split transfers, use one-time addresses or delay transactions to make blockchain activity harder to trace.

The outlet also notes what remains unchanged. Crypto money transmitters still face registration, risk-based anti-money-laundering programs, recordkeeping and suspicious-activity reporting requirements.

FinCEN still considers illicit use of mixing tools a law-enforcement concern and can revisit the issue. The agency has removed the proposed reporting mechanism, not the government’s ability to investigate money laundering or sanction unlawful actors.

The timing also shows how quickly Washington’s crypto posture is changing. While FinCEN is retiring unfinished proposals, the CFTC is opening a separate public-comment process on how crypto transactions and markets should be regulated.

.@CFTC Seeks Public Comment on Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Relating to Regulation Crypto Asset Transactions and Regulation Crypto Asset Markets: https://t.co/0RFFzG0MPp

— CFTC (@CFTC) October 5, 2026

That parallel track is important. The federal government is replacing inherited proposals with a new round of agency-specific rulemaking.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong welcomed the CFTC’s decision to open that process to public comment.

Great to see the CFTC moving forward on rulemaking for crypto, opening up the public comment period. Thank you @ChairmanSelig for your leadership. https://t.co/1p37bcX7SP

— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) October 5, 2026

For wallet developers and privacy-focused users, FinCEN’s decision removes an immediate source of regulatory uncertainty. For compliance teams, it means planned systems built around the abandoned proposals may no longer be needed—but existing Bank Secrecy Act duties still are.

The larger signal is a shift in method. Washington is moving away from broad proposals written before the current market structure took shape and toward a fresh rulebook being built in public.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.